No surprise if fuel ban is delayed again or scrapped
I AM not surprised that Malaysia's proposed ban on Singapore-registered cars filling up within 50km of the border has been a case of "Is it on? Or is it off?".
As the proposal may "kill" those petrol stations that aim for Singaporean patronage, I will not be shocked if the implementation date is delayed yet again. The policy could even be scrapped in the end.
It is not the first time that Malaysia has been indecisive in implementing new policies. The current delay is, as reported, due to administrative issues such as publicity and the printing of posters to be placed at affected stations.
Shouldn't these issues have been addressed first before the announcement was made?
In 2006, the Malaysian government announced that it would impose a levy of RM$20 (S$8.45) on Singapore-registered cars entering Johor. The implementation date was also delayed a few times - before the policy was scrapped altogether.
It resulted in unnecessary confusion for Singaporeans. This could have been avoided if the government had studied the issues carefully before making the announcement.
Singaporean drivers have to ensure that their petrol tank is at least 3/4 full before they enter Malaysia. So for day trippers, there is really not much to save from topping up petrol in Johor Baru.
Besides, they have to put up with traffic jams at the checkpoints in both Singapore and Johor. There is also the risk of crime. It is just not worth it.
I believe Singaporeans would have no problem with the proposed ban, but we would appreciate it if the Malaysian government could be more sure of its decision, so that we will not be confused unnecessarily.