I REFER to the letter, "Belting up in school buses should not be compulsory" (my paper, Oct 20).

There is a great need for primary- school pupils to belt up, and there should be laws to make school buses kid-friendly.

I disagree with the letter-writer on the following counts:

Firstly, if we are going to risk children's lives to encourage more creativity, then no, thank you.

Secondly, rising costs are an excuse, as the children whose lives are being protected are the future leaders of Singapore.

Thirdly, using "accidents happen" as a reason for not installing seat belts smacks of irresponsibility.

Fourthly, how could seat belts become a liability when a bus overturns?

Even if there were no seat belts, there is no guarantee that the children would be able to get out of an overturned bus on their own.

Nevertheless, seven- to 12- year-olds should be able to unbuckle their own belts.

Even for the small minority who cannot, bus attendants who take care of the children on board can help them get out.

We also have to consider the consequences of not making seat belts compulsory. This would send a message that the Government does not care for children.

Seat belts also serve the purpose of keeping mischievous children in their seats.

However, I agree with the letter- writer that back doors of buses can be made more secure, and the Government should look into this.

Mr Woo Jek Jin

See also:
Belting up in school buses should not be compulsory

For more my paper stories click here.